Products related to Judges:
-
Judges
Price: 8.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Judges
Camilleri, best known for his Inspector Montalbano series, presents the charming Judge Surra who moves to a small Sicilian town in the late nineteenth century.He does not quite understand the quirky welcoming gifts from the locals, but nothing stands in the way of his quest for justice - and pastries.Lucarelli brings us a far darker story. Judge Valentina Lorenzi - La Bambina - is so young and inexperienced she hardly merits a bodyguard.But when she barely survives an assassin's bullet, her black-and-white world of crime and punishment turns a deathly shade of grey.In The Triple Dream of the Prosecutor, De Cataldo, a judge himself, crafts a Kafkaesque tale of a lifelong feud between Prosecutor Mandati and the corrupt Mayor of Novere.When the mayor narrowly escapes a series of bizarre assassination attempts, Mandati begins to realise that all his dreams may just be coming true.From Italy's premiere crime authors, three novellas from every tradition of crime writing.
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Brain Science for Lawyers, Judges, and Policymakers
Brain science in the form of neuroscientific evidence now appears frequently in courtrooms and policy discussions alike.Many legal issues are at stake, such as how to separate the best uses of brain science information from those that are potentially biasing or misleading.It is crucial to evaluate brain science evidence in light of relevant legal standards (such as the Daubert and Frye Rules). Brain Science for Lawyers, Judges, and Policymakers responds to this rapidly changing legal landscape, providing a user-friendly introduction to the fundamentals of neuroscience for lawyers, advocates, judges, legal academics, and policymakers.It features detailed but clear illustrations, as well as a comprehensive and accessible overview of developments in legally relevant neuroscience.Readers will learn brain science terms, how to understand and discuss brain structure and function in legally relevant contexts, and how to avoid over- or under-interpreting neuroscientific evidence. The book begins with a survey of the kinds of litigation, legislation, and regulation where neuroscience is currently being used.It provides accessible descriptions of basic brain anatomy and brain function as well as an overview of how modern technologies can reveal the brain structures and brain functions of individuals.It finishes with cautions and limitations, including timely and thought-provoking observations about where the future of neurolaw might lead.Throughout, the authors offer clear and concise guidance on understanding both the promise and the limitations of using brain science in law and policymaking.
Price: 25.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Murmuring Judges
A young lawyer's involvement in her first case leads her through a criminal justice system - police, courts and prisons - which is cracking at the seams. Murmuring Judges is the second play in David Hare's highly acclaimed trilogy about British institutions.Racing Demon, which won four awards as Play of the Year in 1990, was the first part of the trilogy and examined the Church.The Absence of War, a play about the Labour Party, completed the trilogy.
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
Are judges too lenient?
The perception of whether judges are too lenient varies depending on individual perspectives and specific cases. Some may argue that judges are too lenient, especially in cases involving serious crimes, while others may believe that judges are fair and consider all aspects of a case before making a decision. It's important to remember that judges are trained to consider various factors, such as the defendant's background and circumstances, when determining sentences. Ultimately, the perception of leniency in the judicial system is subjective and can vary from case to case.
-
Who judges your purchases?
I am the one who judges my purchases. I consider factors such as the quality, price, and necessity of the item before making a decision. I also take into account my personal values and budget when evaluating whether a purchase is worth it. Ultimately, I am responsible for determining whether a purchase aligns with my needs and priorities.
-
Are prosecutors and judges neutral?
Prosecutors and judges are expected to be neutral and impartial in their roles within the legal system. They are supposed to base their decisions on the evidence presented and the law, rather than personal biases or outside influences. However, like all individuals, they may have their own beliefs and perspectives that could potentially impact their decisions. It is essential for them to strive for objectivity and fairness in order to uphold the principles of justice.
-
Do judges sometimes call lawyers?
Yes, judges sometimes call lawyers to discuss case-related matters, scheduling issues, or to clarify legal arguments presented in court. These calls are typically made to the lawyers representing the parties involved in the case and are meant to facilitate the legal proceedings and ensure that all parties are informed and prepared. However, judges are expected to maintain impartiality and avoid engaging in ex parte communications, which means they should not communicate with only one party without the other party's knowledge or presence.
Similar search terms for Judges:
-
Judges Court
Price: 68 € | Shipping*: 0.00 € -
Judges Court
Price: 32 € | Shipping*: 0.00 € -
How Judges Think
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A.Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases.When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning.However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs.In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion.Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term.In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists.Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based.It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic.Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning.Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication.More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.
Price: 22.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
JUDGES Volume Three
United States of America, 2051 A.D. It has been twenty years since Eustace Fargo’s justice bill was passed.There are new weapons on the streets and vast city blocks rising to the sky, as the first human being sets out to visit another star system.New York, California and Texas cry out for autonomy, chafing against a federal government they feel has lost control. Reeling from news of Chief Justice Fargo’s death in service, the nation asks: has it all been worth it?
Price: 8.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
How do judges judge gymnastics?
Judges in gymnastics use a scoring system to evaluate the performance of gymnasts. They assess the difficulty, execution, and artistry of the routine, looking for elements such as strength, flexibility, balance, and precision. Each routine is assigned a start value based on its difficulty, and deductions are made for errors or lack of execution. The judges then award scores based on the overall performance, with the highest and lowest scores being dropped and the remaining scores averaged to determine the final score. This process requires judges to have a deep understanding of the sport and its technical requirements.
-
Can the GNTM judges speak German?
Yes, the judges on Germany's Next Top Model (GNTM) can speak German. The show is produced in Germany and the judges are typically German or have a strong command of the German language. This allows them to effectively communicate with the contestants and provide feedback during the competition.
-
Who earns more, judges or prosecutors?
In general, judges tend to earn more than prosecutors. Judges are typically appointed or elected to their positions and have higher salaries due to their level of experience, expertise, and responsibility in overseeing court proceedings and making legal decisions. Prosecutors, on the other hand, are usually employed by the government as legal representatives in criminal cases and may have lower salaries compared to judges.
-
Who appoints the judges in Germany?
In Germany, judges are appointed by independent judicial selection committees, which are composed of judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals. The committees make recommendations for judicial appointments to the respective government authorities, who then officially appoint the judges. This process is designed to ensure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary in Germany.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.